difficile sequences among which four SNPs resulted in missense mu

difficile sequences among which four SNPs resulted in missense mutations but none of the mutations modified amino acids in the cleavage or active sites of LexA (Figure 1). Our analysis GDC 0449 grouped the investigated strains into three clusters according to the C. difficile LexA (Figure 2). Cluster I encompassed 3 non-toxinogenic strains and strains of toxinotype 0; Cluster II encompassed strains of toxinotypes III, VIII, IX, and X and finally, Cluster III with the highest number of SNPs, was mostly composed of toxinotype V strains. Ribotypes for the above stated toxinotypes can be found in the

Additional file 1: Table S1. Previous results showed that strains belonging to the epidemic ribotype 027 form a genome wide clade [20, 21], typically characterised as the toxinotype III (North American pulsed field gel electrophoresis type 1 – NAP1, REA group BI). Interestingly, ribotypes 016, 019, 036, 075, 111, 122, 153, 156, click here 176, 208 and 273 are closely related to ribotype 027 by comparative genomics [20, 21], and those ribotypes were found to encompass the lexA cluster II. Comparative phylogenomics along with MLST (multilocus sequence typing) and whole genome sequecing has shown that ribotype 078 lineage is different than other C.

difficile lineages [22]. Moreover PCR ribotype 078 forms a phylogenetically coherent group with ribotypes 033, 045, 066, 078, 126 and 127 [23] – which encompasses lexA cluster III. Genetically distinct strains that belong to ribotypes 078 (V) and 126 (V) clustered BI 2536 together showing the highest number of SNPs in the lexA gene. The phylogenetic tree based on LexA variability reflects similarities to genetic lineages based

on ribotype patterns and comparative genomics analysis. Figure 1 Variability of lexA gene in Clostridium difficile . Representation of the C. difficile 630 strain lexA nucleotide sequence in comparison to repressor sequences of 62 other strains. Grey arrow denotes the nucleotide sequence of the CD630 lexA gene. Black arrows mark the position of domains in LexA. The number of strains with specific SNP and the corresponding nucleotide/aminoacid change is marked above the arrow. The ordinal number of nucleotides Cobimetinib research buy in lexA is presented below the arrow. The SNPs marked in blue encompass strains from cluster III, composed mainly of strains belonging to the toxinotype V. The position of the cleavage site and the catalytic residues is marked in purple. Figure 2 Dendrogram of the aminoacid sequence allignments of LexA derived from lexA genes of C. difficile strains. PCR ribotypes and toxinotypes of the strains can be found in Additional file 1. In silico screening for the LexA-regulated genes in C. difficile To obtain insight into the LexA regulon genes, we performed in silico genome-wide prediction of LexA binding sites within promoter regions of C. difficile. Using the xFiToM software [24], we screened genomes of thirty C.

Comments are closed.