In the first half of the 20th century, the biologist Spemann already characterized evolutionary systems in a communicative context: ‘Reciprocal interactions may play a large role, in general, in the development of RG7420 harmonious equipotential systems EVP4593 order [24]. Modular therapies represent an alternative therapeutic solution compared to reductionist designed approaches. ‘Systemic’ therapies in a reductionist sense are designed by combinations of modifiers of pathways, which are
more or less tumor-specific, and their rationale is usually based on analytics of pathway signatures [25]. In modular therapies, the communicative complexity of tumors, i.e. the multifold divisions in functions and structures, mirrors the modularly structured totality of tumor-specific communication processes. The present model, a formal-pragmatic communication theory, may now explain the therapeutic efficacy of exclusively biomodulatory acting drug combinations (stimulatory or inhibitory acting drugs, which do not exert mono-activity in the respective Dorsomorphin clinical trial metastatic tumor type and are not
directed to potentially ‘tumor-specific’ targets) in a modularly and evolutionary context. These findings recall the famous remark of Dobzhansky, ‘nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution’ [26]. The important new step in our novel concept of understanding tumor biology and tumor evolution is the introduction of the tumor’s living world as a holistic and therefore self-contained communication process in its idealization, in which external, communication-guiding interferences (modular
knowledge) may be implemented to differentially focus on the coherency of the communication-technically, all-important dimensions validity and denotation. Now, mostly generalized tagged references derived from context-dependent knowledge about single communication-mediating cells, molecules, or pathways may be virtually neglected for communication-technical purposes [6]. These systems objects may be perceived as symbols in a continuum, rich in buy PR-171 content, whose validity and denotation may be exchangeable but not at random. This way, the tumor’s living world is turning into a scientific object that becomes accessible for experimentally or therapeutically designed modular approaches for uncovering the tumor’s modularity. This modularity is defined by a distinct communicative architecture but also by the way how modularity has been communicatively uncovered. Inclusion of prepositions for validity, which are present in the living world, and the implicit interplay of validity and denotation, which may be focused on modular events, afford transparency, how evolutionary processes may be first induced in the range of their molecular-genetically defined backbone.