Research studies measuring the longitudinal benefits of IPE2 suggest the initial benefits from learning together may fade after a number of months. It is therefore imperative that we develop this initiative by testing the attitudes of students and the effects of IPE using an evaluation tool such as the ‘Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale’ (RIPLS). This will help us understand the ongoing value of our IPE programme and if we are to receive ongoing support for IPE within the school curricula. 1. Bradley, P, Cooper, S & Duncan, F. A mixed-methods study of interprofessional learning of resuscitation skills. Medical Education

2009; 43: 912–922. 2. Mattick, K & Bligh, J. Getting the measure of interprofessional learning. Medical Education 2006; 40: 399–400. S. Jee, E. Schafheutle, Temsirolimus nmr S. Willis The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK This study aimed to explore how work-based pre-registration pharmacy technician (PT) training is delivered in community and hospital in Great Britain The breadth of supervisors and staff that could support pre-registration PTs, study time, and studying facilities differed between sector Differences in the delivery of pre-registration PT training may affect completion time/rates and overall training quality Since July 2011, pharmacy technicians (PTs) have to be registered with the General Pharmaceutical Council. Prior to registration, pre-registration PTs must complete

a knowledge- and competence-based qualification and undertake sufficient work-based pharmacy experience.1 Given the paucity of research in the area, this study aimed to explore how work-based PT training is delivered INCB018424 manufacturer in community and hospital settings in Great Britain (GB). Semi-structured interviews MycoClean Mycoplasma Removal Kit were conducted with a purposive sample of stakeholders from community pharmacy and NHS hospital organisations across GB. Individuals who had an understanding of pre-registration PT training delivery within their organisation were approached. Recruitment continued until data saturation was reached.

Data were analysed thematically using template analysis.2 University ethics approval was granted. Thirty-one participants were recruited from 14 community pharmacy (independents; supermarkets; multiples) and 15 NHS organisations (hospitals; regional training centres). Participants included PT education and training leads, training and development managers and pharmacy managers. There was consistency in the supervision of pre-registration PT trainees across hospitals. Trainees had a supervisor or ‘tutor’ who was their main point of contact, often the lead of pharmacy technician education and training. Trainees also had supervisors during rotations (e.g. aseptics) and a named assessor for continuity in assessing the competence-based portfolio and for general support. Trainees also worked with a number of qualified pharmacy technicians.