The 3D isosurface graphs are also given for a clear view for the ABC triblock

copolymer confined between the hard surfaces. The red, green, and blue colors in isosurface graphs are assigned to the blocks A, B, and C for a good correspondence, respectively. For the ABC triblock copolymer confined between polymer brush-coated substrates, the 3D isosurface of the grafted polymer on the lower substrate is also shown below the morphology due to the symmetry of the polymer brush. For the ABC triblock copolymer confined between hard surfaces, the 3D isosurface is also shown below the morphology. When f A = 0.4, f B = 0.4, and f C = 0.2 at σ = 0.15, the phase LAM3 ll -HFs is stable, while the stable phase GANT61 clinical trial for the thin film confined between hard surfaces is three-color lamellae with parallel cylinders at the interfaces. When f A = 0.4, f B = 0.2, and f C = 0.4 at σ = 0.15, the perpendicular lamellar phase LAM3 ⊥ is stable, while the perpendicular lamellar phase with cylinder at the interfaces is stable without Selleckchem mTOR inhibitor the coated polymer brush at the surfaces. From

the morphology of the polymer brush, we can see that there is some ordered AZD5153 supplier pattern at the interface between the thin film and the polymer brush. So, we think the coated polymers on the substrates have penetrated into the ABC triblock copolymer thin film, and the interaction between them contributes to morphology formation of the thin film. For the case of f A = 0.4, f B = 0.2, and f C = 0.4, the perpendicular lamellar phase with cylinders at the interfaces is stable without the coated polymer brush at the surfaces. But when it is confined between the polymer brush-coated substrates, the polymer brush will penetrate into the block copolymer thin film and form one phase (-)-p-Bromotetramisole Oxalate with the middle block B, so the perpendicular lamellar phase occurs. The density profile of the block copolymer along z-direction can be obtained by (i belongs to blocks A, B, and C and grafting polymer g). Figure  7 gives the density profiles of the blocks A(solid),

B(dash), and C(dot) and the grafting polymer(dash dot) for the cases (a) f A = 0.4, f B = 0.4, and f C = 0.2 and (b) f A = 0.4, f B = 0.2, f C = 0.4. The polymer brush and the middle block B have interpenetration. So, the interfacial morphology is different from the block copolymer confined between hard surfaces. We can see the lamellar distribution parallel to the substrates for f A = 0.4, f B = 0.4, f C = 0.2, so there are peaks along z-direction which correspond to the domain centers of the blocks. The perpendicular lamellar phase forms for f A = 0.4, f B = 0.2, f C = 0.4, and the uniform distribution exists in the middle of the film. The curves for the blocks A and C are overlapped due to the same composition and the symmetric interaction parameters between different blocks.